Review



magnetic bead protein rna complexes  (New England Biolabs)


Bioz Verified Symbol New England Biolabs is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol New England Biolabs manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    New England Biolabs magnetic bead protein rna complexes
    Magnetic Bead Protein Rna Complexes, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 672 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/magnetic bead protein rna complexes/product/New England Biolabs
    Average 96 stars, based on 672 article reviews
    magnetic bead protein rna complexes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    New England Biolabs magnetic bead protein rna complexes
    Magnetic Bead Protein Rna Complexes, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/magnetic bead protein rna complexes/product/New England Biolabs
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    magnetic bead protein rna complexes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    MedChemExpress rna protein complex
    Rna Protein Complex, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rna protein complex/product/MedChemExpress
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rna protein complex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    New England Biolabs bead rna protein complexes
    Bead Rna Protein Complexes, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/bead rna protein complexes/product/New England Biolabs
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    bead rna protein complexes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    New England Biolabs immunoprecipitate an rna rbms2 protein complex
    Immunoprecipitate An Rna Rbms2 Protein Complex, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/immunoprecipitate an rna rbms2 protein complex/product/New England Biolabs
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    immunoprecipitate an rna rbms2 protein complex - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc rna protein complexes
    Rna Protein Complexes, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/rna protein complexes/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    rna protein complexes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    New England Biolabs tis11b protein rna complexes
    (A) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells after transfection of mCherry <t>(mC)-TIS11B</t> and GFP-SEC61B to visualize TGs and the rough ER. Scale bars, 5 μm. (B) Schematic of a cell with three cytoplasmic compartments. (C) As in (A) but showing fluorescent TG (left) and ER (right) particles. (D) Transcript localization scores obtained from TG samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (E) Transcript localization scores obtained from ER samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 1 × 10 −123 . (F) Transcript localization scores obtained from CY samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. (G) smRNA-FISH of endogenous TG+ mRNA BAG3 (green) in HeLa cells. TIS granules (BFP-TIS11B, blue) and the ER (GFP-SEC61B, magenta) were simultaneously visualized. Bottom panel shows 5 × zoom-in of boxed area. White circles: mRNA colocalization with TG, dashed white circles: mRNA colocalization with ER. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (H) As in (G), but smRNA-FISH of the ER+ mRNA ALDH18A1 . (I) Quantification of smRNA-FISH foci. White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on TG compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 5 × 10 −11 (Mann-Whitney test). Additional images in – . Individual values are shown in Figures S2H and . (J) As in (I). White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on ER compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 1 × 10 −6 . (K) The ratio of smRNA-FISH foci colocalizing with the ER compared with the foci colocalizing with TGs, shown for mRNAs from (I) and (J). t test for independent samples, *p = 0.044. Horizontal line, median; error bars; 25th and 75th percentiles. (L) smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs in HeLa cells before (−) and after (+) digitonin extraction. Dotted lines indicate cell boundaries. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (M) Quantification of (L). Shown is the fraction of digitonin-resistant smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Number of cells analyzed, see . Additional images in Figures S3A – . t test for independent samples, *p < 0.041. (N) smRNA-FISH validation summary. Shown is ranking obtained from localization scores.
    Tis11b Protein Rna Complexes, supplied by New England Biolabs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/tis11b protein rna complexes/product/New England Biolabs
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    tis11b protein rna complexes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Thermo Fisher magnetic bead-protein/rna complexes
    (A) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells after transfection of mCherry <t>(mC)-TIS11B</t> and GFP-SEC61B to visualize TGs and the rough ER. Scale bars, 5 μm. (B) Schematic of a cell with three cytoplasmic compartments. (C) As in (A) but showing fluorescent TG (left) and ER (right) particles. (D) Transcript localization scores obtained from TG samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (E) Transcript localization scores obtained from ER samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 1 × 10 −123 . (F) Transcript localization scores obtained from CY samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. (G) smRNA-FISH of endogenous TG+ mRNA BAG3 (green) in HeLa cells. TIS granules (BFP-TIS11B, blue) and the ER (GFP-SEC61B, magenta) were simultaneously visualized. Bottom panel shows 5 × zoom-in of boxed area. White circles: mRNA colocalization with TG, dashed white circles: mRNA colocalization with ER. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (H) As in (G), but smRNA-FISH of the ER+ mRNA ALDH18A1 . (I) Quantification of smRNA-FISH foci. White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on TG compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 5 × 10 −11 (Mann-Whitney test). Additional images in – . Individual values are shown in Figures S2H and . (J) As in (I). White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on ER compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 1 × 10 −6 . (K) The ratio of smRNA-FISH foci colocalizing with the ER compared with the foci colocalizing with TGs, shown for mRNAs from (I) and (J). t test for independent samples, *p = 0.044. Horizontal line, median; error bars; 25th and 75th percentiles. (L) smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs in HeLa cells before (−) and after (+) digitonin extraction. Dotted lines indicate cell boundaries. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (M) Quantification of (L). Shown is the fraction of digitonin-resistant smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Number of cells analyzed, see . Additional images in Figures S3A – . t test for independent samples, *p < 0.041. (N) smRNA-FISH validation summary. Shown is ranking obtained from localization scores.
    Magnetic Bead Protein/Rna Complexes, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/magnetic bead-protein/rna complexes/product/Thermo Fisher
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    magnetic bead-protein/rna complexes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc protein rna complexes
    (A) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells after transfection of mCherry <t>(mC)-TIS11B</t> and GFP-SEC61B to visualize TGs and the rough ER. Scale bars, 5 μm. (B) Schematic of a cell with three cytoplasmic compartments. (C) As in (A) but showing fluorescent TG (left) and ER (right) particles. (D) Transcript localization scores obtained from TG samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (E) Transcript localization scores obtained from ER samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 1 × 10 −123 . (F) Transcript localization scores obtained from CY samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. (G) smRNA-FISH of endogenous TG+ mRNA BAG3 (green) in HeLa cells. TIS granules (BFP-TIS11B, blue) and the ER (GFP-SEC61B, magenta) were simultaneously visualized. Bottom panel shows 5 × zoom-in of boxed area. White circles: mRNA colocalization with TG, dashed white circles: mRNA colocalization with ER. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (H) As in (G), but smRNA-FISH of the ER+ mRNA ALDH18A1 . (I) Quantification of smRNA-FISH foci. White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on TG compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 5 × 10 −11 (Mann-Whitney test). Additional images in – . Individual values are shown in Figures S2H and . (J) As in (I). White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on ER compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 1 × 10 −6 . (K) The ratio of smRNA-FISH foci colocalizing with the ER compared with the foci colocalizing with TGs, shown for mRNAs from (I) and (J). t test for independent samples, *p = 0.044. Horizontal line, median; error bars; 25th and 75th percentiles. (L) smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs in HeLa cells before (−) and after (+) digitonin extraction. Dotted lines indicate cell boundaries. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (M) Quantification of (L). Shown is the fraction of digitonin-resistant smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Number of cells analyzed, see . Additional images in Figures S3A – . t test for independent samples, *p < 0.041. (N) smRNA-FISH validation summary. Shown is ranking obtained from localization scores.
    Protein Rna Complexes, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/protein rna complexes/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    protein rna complexes - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells after transfection of mCherry (mC)-TIS11B and GFP-SEC61B to visualize TGs and the rough ER. Scale bars, 5 μm. (B) Schematic of a cell with three cytoplasmic compartments. (C) As in (A) but showing fluorescent TG (left) and ER (right) particles. (D) Transcript localization scores obtained from TG samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (E) Transcript localization scores obtained from ER samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 1 × 10 −123 . (F) Transcript localization scores obtained from CY samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. (G) smRNA-FISH of endogenous TG+ mRNA BAG3 (green) in HeLa cells. TIS granules (BFP-TIS11B, blue) and the ER (GFP-SEC61B, magenta) were simultaneously visualized. Bottom panel shows 5 × zoom-in of boxed area. White circles: mRNA colocalization with TG, dashed white circles: mRNA colocalization with ER. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (H) As in (G), but smRNA-FISH of the ER+ mRNA ALDH18A1 . (I) Quantification of smRNA-FISH foci. White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on TG compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 5 × 10 −11 (Mann-Whitney test). Additional images in – . Individual values are shown in Figures S2H and . (J) As in (I). White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on ER compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 1 × 10 −6 . (K) The ratio of smRNA-FISH foci colocalizing with the ER compared with the foci colocalizing with TGs, shown for mRNAs from (I) and (J). t test for independent samples, *p = 0.044. Horizontal line, median; error bars; 25th and 75th percentiles. (L) smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs in HeLa cells before (−) and after (+) digitonin extraction. Dotted lines indicate cell boundaries. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (M) Quantification of (L). Shown is the fraction of digitonin-resistant smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Number of cells analyzed, see . Additional images in Figures S3A – . t test for independent samples, *p < 0.041. (N) smRNA-FISH validation summary. Shown is ranking obtained from localization scores.

    Journal: Molecular cell

    Article Title: Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output

    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.025

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells after transfection of mCherry (mC)-TIS11B and GFP-SEC61B to visualize TGs and the rough ER. Scale bars, 5 μm. (B) Schematic of a cell with three cytoplasmic compartments. (C) As in (A) but showing fluorescent TG (left) and ER (right) particles. (D) Transcript localization scores obtained from TG samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (E) Transcript localization scores obtained from ER samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 1 × 10 −123 . (F) Transcript localization scores obtained from CY samples. Mann-Whitney test, p = 0. (G) smRNA-FISH of endogenous TG+ mRNA BAG3 (green) in HeLa cells. TIS granules (BFP-TIS11B, blue) and the ER (GFP-SEC61B, magenta) were simultaneously visualized. Bottom panel shows 5 × zoom-in of boxed area. White circles: mRNA colocalization with TG, dashed white circles: mRNA colocalization with ER. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (H) As in (G), but smRNA-FISH of the ER+ mRNA ALDH18A1 . (I) Quantification of smRNA-FISH foci. White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on TG compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 5 × 10 −11 (Mann-Whitney test). Additional images in – . Individual values are shown in Figures S2H and . (J) As in (I). White boxplot: expected fraction of mRNA transcripts based on ER compartment size (n = 186 cells). ***p = 1 × 10 −6 . (K) The ratio of smRNA-FISH foci colocalizing with the ER compared with the foci colocalizing with TGs, shown for mRNAs from (I) and (J). t test for independent samples, *p = 0.044. Horizontal line, median; error bars; 25th and 75th percentiles. (L) smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs in HeLa cells before (−) and after (+) digitonin extraction. Dotted lines indicate cell boundaries. Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (M) Quantification of (L). Shown is the fraction of digitonin-resistant smRNA-FISH foci of endogenous mRNAs as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. Number of cells analyzed, see . Additional images in Figures S3A – . t test for independent samples, *p < 0.041. (N) smRNA-FISH validation summary. Shown is ranking obtained from localization scores.

    Article Snippet: TIS11B protein-RNA complexes were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of crosslinked lysate and washed with high salt and PNK buffer (NEB).

    Techniques: Live Cell Imaging, Transfection, MANN-WHITNEY, Extraction

    (A) Steady-state mRNA abundance levels obtained from whole-cell lysates. TG+, N = 1,246; ER+, N = 919, CY+, N = 1,481; unbiased, N = 3,369. Mann-Whitney test: *0.05 > p > 10 −9 ; **10 −10 >p> 10 −20 ; ***10 −21 >p> 10 −80 ; ****10 −81 > p > 0. Exact p values are listed in . Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (B) As in (A), but steady-state protein levels obtained from whole-cell lysates are shown. TG+, N = 469; ER+, N = 638; CY+, N = 833; unbiased, N = 2,001. (C) As in (B), but Pro-seq levels are shown, which indicate transcription rates. TG+, N = 1,222; ER+, N = 896; CY+, N = 1,425; unbiased, N = 3,268. (D) As in (C), but estimated mRNA half-lives are shown. (E) As in (A), but protein size distributions are shown. AA, amino acid. (F) As in (A), but mRNA length distributions are shown. (G) As in (A), but 3′ UTR length distributions are shown. (H) As in (A), but average CDS exon length distributions are shown. (I) ZFP36L1 (TIS11B) mRNA model. Tall boxes: CDS exons, narrow boxes: 5′ and 3′ UTRs. (J) Gene ontology analysis for TG+ mRNAs. Top six functional gene classes uniquely enriched in TG+ mRNAs and Benjamini Hochberg-adjusted p values are shown. (K) As in (J), but for ER+ mRNAs. (L) As in (J), but for CY+ mRNAs.

    Journal: Molecular cell

    Article Title: Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output

    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.025

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Steady-state mRNA abundance levels obtained from whole-cell lysates. TG+, N = 1,246; ER+, N = 919, CY+, N = 1,481; unbiased, N = 3,369. Mann-Whitney test: *0.05 > p > 10 −9 ; **10 −10 >p> 10 −20 ; ***10 −21 >p> 10 −80 ; ****10 −81 > p > 0. Exact p values are listed in . Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (B) As in (A), but steady-state protein levels obtained from whole-cell lysates are shown. TG+, N = 469; ER+, N = 638; CY+, N = 833; unbiased, N = 2,001. (C) As in (B), but Pro-seq levels are shown, which indicate transcription rates. TG+, N = 1,222; ER+, N = 896; CY+, N = 1,425; unbiased, N = 3,268. (D) As in (C), but estimated mRNA half-lives are shown. (E) As in (A), but protein size distributions are shown. AA, amino acid. (F) As in (A), but mRNA length distributions are shown. (G) As in (A), but 3′ UTR length distributions are shown. (H) As in (A), but average CDS exon length distributions are shown. (I) ZFP36L1 (TIS11B) mRNA model. Tall boxes: CDS exons, narrow boxes: 5′ and 3′ UTRs. (J) Gene ontology analysis for TG+ mRNAs. Top six functional gene classes uniquely enriched in TG+ mRNAs and Benjamini Hochberg-adjusted p values are shown. (K) As in (J), but for ER+ mRNAs. (L) As in (J), but for CY+ mRNAs.

    Article Snippet: TIS11B protein-RNA complexes were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of crosslinked lysate and washed with high salt and PNK buffer (NEB).

    Techniques: MANN-WHITNEY, Functional Assay

    (A) Logistic regression results for 3′ UTR-bound RBPs positively or negatively associated with compartment-enriched mRNAs. Full values in . (B) Pearson’s correlation coefficients of mRNA and coding exon length with compartment localization scores (LSs). (C) As in (A) but integrating 3′ UTR-bound RBPs from (A) and mRNA architecture features. (D) Propensity of mRNAs for TG localization stratified by coding exon length and bound RBPs. No RBP (N = 1,498), bound by LARP4B or METAP2 (N = 717) or by TIS11B (N = 834). Mann-Whitney test p values as . Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (E) Model showing additive effects of coding exon length and RBPs on mRNA localization propensity to TGs or the cytosol. Positive effect: (check), negative effect: (x) shown as in Figure 2I . (F) As in (D) for mRNA localization to the ER, stratified by mRNA length and bound RBPs. Bound by TIA1/L1 (N = 634). (G) As in (E) showing additive effects of mRNA length and RBPs on the mRNA localization propensity. (H) As in (D) for mRNAs localization to cytosol, stratified by mRNA length and bound RBPs.

    Journal: Molecular cell

    Article Title: Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output

    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.025

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Logistic regression results for 3′ UTR-bound RBPs positively or negatively associated with compartment-enriched mRNAs. Full values in . (B) Pearson’s correlation coefficients of mRNA and coding exon length with compartment localization scores (LSs). (C) As in (A) but integrating 3′ UTR-bound RBPs from (A) and mRNA architecture features. (D) Propensity of mRNAs for TG localization stratified by coding exon length and bound RBPs. No RBP (N = 1,498), bound by LARP4B or METAP2 (N = 717) or by TIS11B (N = 834). Mann-Whitney test p values as . Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (E) Model showing additive effects of coding exon length and RBPs on mRNA localization propensity to TGs or the cytosol. Positive effect: (check), negative effect: (x) shown as in Figure 2I . (F) As in (D) for mRNA localization to the ER, stratified by mRNA length and bound RBPs. Bound by TIA1/L1 (N = 634). (G) As in (E) showing additive effects of mRNA length and RBPs on the mRNA localization propensity. (H) As in (D) for mRNAs localization to cytosol, stratified by mRNA length and bound RBPs.

    Article Snippet: TIS11B protein-RNA complexes were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of crosslinked lysate and washed with high salt and PNK buffer (NEB).

    Techniques: MANN-WHITNEY

    (A) TG+ mRNAs are shown and are color-coded based on their change in compartment localization. No change (N = 508). (B) Length distribution of mRNAs from (A). Mann-Whitney test p values as in . (C) As in (B) but for protein size distribution. Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (D) As in (B) but for CDS exon length distribution. (E) As in but for mRNA features of TG+ mRNAs that change their localization upon TIS11B KO. (F) Schematic of mRNA reporter for validation of a 3′ UTR-bound RBP on mRNA localization. The GFP-THAP1 reporter mRNA contains MS2 hairpins as 3′ UTR, which bind to cotransfected MS2 coat protein (mCherry-tagged MCP). TIAL1-MCP fusion tethers TIAL1 to the reporter 3′ UTR. mC, mCherry. (G) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing the indicated constructs. Scale bars, 5 μm. (H) RNA-FISH (teal) of the GFP reporter mRNA from (F) in HeLa cells. GFP-SEC61B visualizes the rough ER (magenta). Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (I) Pearson’s correlation coefficients of fluorescence intensities at arrows in (H). (J) Quantification of (H) and (I). MCP (n = 26 cells), MCP-TIAL1 (n = 21). Horizontal line: median, error bars: 25th, 75th percentiles. Mann-Whitney test, ****p < 0.0001.

    Journal: Molecular cell

    Article Title: Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output

    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.025

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) TG+ mRNAs are shown and are color-coded based on their change in compartment localization. No change (N = 508). (B) Length distribution of mRNAs from (A). Mann-Whitney test p values as in . (C) As in (B) but for protein size distribution. Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (D) As in (B) but for CDS exon length distribution. (E) As in but for mRNA features of TG+ mRNAs that change their localization upon TIS11B KO. (F) Schematic of mRNA reporter for validation of a 3′ UTR-bound RBP on mRNA localization. The GFP-THAP1 reporter mRNA contains MS2 hairpins as 3′ UTR, which bind to cotransfected MS2 coat protein (mCherry-tagged MCP). TIAL1-MCP fusion tethers TIAL1 to the reporter 3′ UTR. mC, mCherry. (G) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing the indicated constructs. Scale bars, 5 μm. (H) RNA-FISH (teal) of the GFP reporter mRNA from (F) in HeLa cells. GFP-SEC61B visualizes the rough ER (magenta). Representative images are shown. Scale bars, 5 μm. (I) Pearson’s correlation coefficients of fluorescence intensities at arrows in (H). (J) Quantification of (H) and (I). MCP (n = 26 cells), MCP-TIAL1 (n = 21). Horizontal line: median, error bars: 25th, 75th percentiles. Mann-Whitney test, ****p < 0.0001.

    Article Snippet: TIS11B protein-RNA complexes were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of crosslinked lysate and washed with high salt and PNK buffer (NEB).

    Techniques: MANN-WHITNEY, Live Cell Imaging, Expressing, Construct, Fluorescence

    (A) Protein abundance of mRNAs stratified by RBP binding. No RBP (N = 126), bound by TIS11B (N = 267), bound by TIA1/L1 (N = 232). Mann-Whitney test p values as in . Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (B) GFP protein expression in HeLa cells using the GFP-THAP1 reporter mRNA with and without TIAL1 tethering. Representative histograms are shown. Dotted lines: GFP-negative cells. (C) Quantification of (B) as mean ± SD of five independent experiments. t test for independent samples, ****p = 0.0003. (D) Quantification of mRNA level from (B) as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. t test for independent samples. (E) Schematic of GFP-THAP1 mRNA reporter to investigate the influence of subcellular mRNA localization on protein expression. MCP-SEC61B fusion localizes the reporter mRNA (as in Figure 4F ) to the rough ER membrane, MCP localizes it to the cytosol. (F) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells. Scale bars, 5 μm. (G) As in (B), but reporter mRNA was used with and without SEC61B tethering. (H) Quantification of (G) as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. t test for independent samples, **p = 0.0026. (I) Quantification of mRNA level from (G) as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. t test for independent samples, NS, not significant. (J) As in . Addition of prenylation signal (CAAX) localizes the TIAL1-bound reporter mRNA to the plasma membrane. In the absence of CAAX, the TIAL1-bound reporter mRNA localizes to the rough ER. (K) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells. Scale bars, 5 μm. (L) As in (B) but the reporter mRNA was tethered with the indicated constructs. (M) Quantification of (L) as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. t test for independent samples, ****p < 0.0006, **p = 0.002. (N) Endogenous mRNAs bound by TIA1/L1 encode higher expressed proteins than mRNAs not bound by any RBP. The largest TIA1/L1-associated increase was observed for ER+ mRNAs. Mann-Whitney test p values as in .

    Journal: Molecular cell

    Article Title: Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output

    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.025

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Protein abundance of mRNAs stratified by RBP binding. No RBP (N = 126), bound by TIS11B (N = 267), bound by TIA1/L1 (N = 232). Mann-Whitney test p values as in . Boxplots depict median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box), and 5% and 95% confidence intervals (error bars). (B) GFP protein expression in HeLa cells using the GFP-THAP1 reporter mRNA with and without TIAL1 tethering. Representative histograms are shown. Dotted lines: GFP-negative cells. (C) Quantification of (B) as mean ± SD of five independent experiments. t test for independent samples, ****p = 0.0003. (D) Quantification of mRNA level from (B) as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. t test for independent samples. (E) Schematic of GFP-THAP1 mRNA reporter to investigate the influence of subcellular mRNA localization on protein expression. MCP-SEC61B fusion localizes the reporter mRNA (as in Figure 4F ) to the rough ER membrane, MCP localizes it to the cytosol. (F) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells. Scale bars, 5 μm. (G) As in (B), but reporter mRNA was used with and without SEC61B tethering. (H) Quantification of (G) as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. t test for independent samples, **p = 0.0026. (I) Quantification of mRNA level from (G) as mean ± SD of three independent experiments. t test for independent samples, NS, not significant. (J) As in . Addition of prenylation signal (CAAX) localizes the TIAL1-bound reporter mRNA to the plasma membrane. In the absence of CAAX, the TIAL1-bound reporter mRNA localizes to the rough ER. (K) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells. Scale bars, 5 μm. (L) As in (B) but the reporter mRNA was tethered with the indicated constructs. (M) Quantification of (L) as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. t test for independent samples, ****p < 0.0006, **p = 0.002. (N) Endogenous mRNAs bound by TIA1/L1 encode higher expressed proteins than mRNAs not bound by any RBP. The largest TIA1/L1-associated increase was observed for ER+ mRNAs. Mann-Whitney test p values as in .

    Article Snippet: TIS11B protein-RNA complexes were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of crosslinked lysate and washed with high salt and PNK buffer (NEB).

    Techniques: Binding Assay, MANN-WHITNEY, Expressing, Membrane, Live Cell Imaging, Construct

    (A) Schematic of a GFP-THAP1 reporter mRNA bound by TIS11B to investigate localization-dependent GFP protein expression. MCP-TIS11B fusion localizes the mRNA reporter to the cytosol. TIS11B-MCP-SEC61B fusion localizes the mRNA reporter to the rough ER membrane. (B) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing constructs from (A). Scale bars, 5 μm. (C) As in . (D) Quantification of (C) as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. t test for independent samples, ****p < 0.0001, **p = 0.003. (E) Quantification of mRNA level in the experiment from (C). Shown is the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. t test for independent samples, *p = 0.037; NS, not significant.

    Journal: Molecular cell

    Article Title: Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output

    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.025

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of a GFP-THAP1 reporter mRNA bound by TIS11B to investigate localization-dependent GFP protein expression. MCP-TIS11B fusion localizes the mRNA reporter to the cytosol. TIS11B-MCP-SEC61B fusion localizes the mRNA reporter to the rough ER membrane. (B) Confocal live cell imaging of HeLa cells expressing constructs from (A). Scale bars, 5 μm. (C) As in . (D) Quantification of (C) as mean ± SD of four independent experiments. t test for independent samples, ****p < 0.0001, **p = 0.003. (E) Quantification of mRNA level in the experiment from (C). Shown is the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. t test for independent samples, *p = 0.037; NS, not significant.

    Article Snippet: TIS11B protein-RNA complexes were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of crosslinked lysate and washed with high salt and PNK buffer (NEB).

    Techniques: Expressing, Membrane, Live Cell Imaging, Construct

    KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Journal: Molecular cell

    Article Title: Subcytoplasmic location of translation controls protein output

    doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.11.025

    Figure Lengend Snippet: KEY RESOURCES TABLE

    Article Snippet: TIS11B protein-RNA complexes were immunoprecipitated from 1 ml of crosslinked lysate and washed with high salt and PNK buffer (NEB).

    Techniques: Recombinant, Blocking Assay, Magnetic Beads, Reverse Transcription, Protease Inhibitor, Sequencing, Modification, Plasmid Preparation, Software